<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bespoke Homes : Facit Design Using BIM to Design Homes for Assembly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frombulator.com/2012/08/bespoke-homes-facit-design-using-bim-to-design-homes-for-assembly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frombulator.com/2012/08/bespoke-homes-facit-design-using-bim-to-design-homes-for-assembly/</link>
	<description>Half Work, Half Play, Half other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Foster</title>
		<link>http://frombulator.com/2012/08/bespoke-homes-facit-design-using-bim-to-design-homes-for-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frombulator.com/?p=1429#comment-6767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well when the bottom dropped out in 2008 is was all about doing more with less, and everyone unionized or not were getting haircuts.  But it is a valid argument, especially one predicated on hourly/billable pay.  Why make things more efficient? However, technologies will get incoporparated as leading edge companies prove their mettle and the worth of these.  BIM, modular buildings, etc. I guess don&#039;t have the intial holy sh*8 moment of the first nail gun, but tough to argue against the nail gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well when the bottom dropped out in 2008 is was all about doing more with less, and everyone unionized or not were getting haircuts.  But it is a valid argument, especially one predicated on hourly/billable pay.  Why make things more efficient? However, technologies will get incoporparated as leading edge companies prove their mettle and the worth of these.  BIM, modular buildings, etc. I guess don&#8217;t have the intial holy sh*8 moment of the first nail gun, but tough to argue against the nail gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://frombulator.com/2012/08/bespoke-homes-facit-design-using-bim-to-design-homes-for-assembly/comment-page-1/#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frombulator.com/?p=1429#comment-6383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always wonder what the labor implications are when I talk or read about technologies that are bringing efficiency to construction. I&#039;m all for it, but I know the 800lb gorilla in the room is labor.  Your thoughts?  Anybody else got a position?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wonder what the labor implications are when I talk or read about technologies that are bringing efficiency to construction. I&#8217;m all for it, but I know the 800lb gorilla in the room is labor.  Your thoughts?  Anybody else got a position?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
