BIM : Contractors Reporting Big ROI
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, Built Environment, ROI, Virtual Construction on July 9, 2009
I the May/June Addition of Constructor Magazine, there are some excellent examples of Contractors using BIM. One high light was that over 1/3 responded with over 100% ROI. And more and more your finding contractors creating whole departments, aptly and somewhat spookily called “Virtual Construction Departments”. I guess I find it spooky in the sense that so many in the disciplines thought if you were not pouring concrete or putting steel up you were not adding value, however, with BIM we are starting to see a tremendous effort on the front end.
Gilbane Building in Providence found over 1,445 clashes in a 96,000 SF data center saving the owner over $800,000 in resolved issues. All in they believed they saved the owner more than $1,000,000 while investing only $63,000 in BIM expenses. Half of which was creating a BIM from 2D documents, etc.
Great Stuff, Read the Article.
Revit: As a Service? BIM As a Service? | SaaS
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, Entrepreneurship, New Technologies, Revit, SaaS on July 3, 2009
I read this morning through a linkedin update of an individual/firm that is running Revit on a 16-core Intel i7 Xeon 2.67GHz, 1GB Video Card, 12GB RAM workstation, and was asking if anyone was interested in using it for design/rendering/etc. I guess this was only a matter of time, but it begs the question of SaaS entering the AEC Software Marketplace. AutoDesk has Dragonfly that allows to export directly into a Revit format. I am not sure who the target user is for this, although they mention that “it can streamline your next home improvement. ” Again is the regular home user or enthusiast going to pick up dragonfly for an improvement project? Or is some who has a visualization program going to change workflows or programs to use Dragonfly? Or better is it Autodesk trying to work the kinks out of what could become a full blown SaaS (Software as a Service) effort? Certainly, they have to be thinking of this, especially when everyone can spit out SaaS or Cloud Computing fast enough to show they are with it.
What would the pricing model look like, free, freemium, premium, etc? I think it would be important from a data point of view, not a legal who owns the data point of view, but imagine actually having data stored centrally, and and then the building becomes the OS (operating system) and everyone adds value to the building through analysis and management, and 3rd parties writing apps, etc. Not that does not happen now, but it in the standard software, mostly stand alone, environment. Cracking this nut open as a marketplace, interesting to ponder. ANd it could bring a whoel new vitality to the marketplace beyond the current BIM movement. Keep an eye out on Dragonfly it might just tell us.
IFC Open Engine: BIM
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, IFC, Open Engine on June 29, 2009
Following up from last post with the open question, Open Engine and IFC. I found this but need to dig to see what is in development, who’s using it, succesful implmentations. I know this blog is one in kajillion but would love to hear what the programming community is doing around this.
BIM Required on Alteration and Adaptation over $2.5M: Wisconsin
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, Built Environment, IFC, Point to Point Laser Technology on June 29, 2009
So the GSA took the lead and states are starting to follow. Wisconsin announced that on all addition and alteration projects that require $2.5M or greater that a BIM is required. With this announcement they also released there own set of guidelines. Interesting note is that both the GSA and Wisconsin are platform agnostic and refer to software as BIM authoring software or discipline specialty software, and that it must be IFC compliant.
So when does the movement around IFC begin like Linux?
In Defense of Craftsmanship
Posted by Jim Foster in APBS, BIM, Built Environment, Entrepreneurship, Good on ya on June 29, 2009
“Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work” by Matthew B. Crawford was recently released by Penguin. An excellent review from Kelefa Sanneh in the New Yorker was just in a recent addition of the New Yorker, and who’s review prompted this post. While I have only read excerpts from the book the ideas certainly resonated with me. The book is expanded from an article in The New Atlantis both the article and the book explore the idea of craftsmanship and how modernday office workers are so far removed from actual products they lose pride in there work. He also argues that physical labor or “manual competence” is a key ingredient in craftsmanship, and who’s appreciation for how hard it can be to do something right forms a bridge or creates social currency between other craftsmen, generations and in general, people and the lack of it divorces us from our work, and then arguably, people. Here he quotes Alexandre Kojève.
The man who works recognizes his own product in the World that has actually been transformed by his work: he recognizes himself in it, he sees in it his own human reality, in it he discovers and reveals to others the objective reality of his humanity, of the originally abstract and purely subjective idea he has of himself.
With the lack of manual competence and its social currency, the only thing we then have to rely on is hard currency, which may or may not be the best yardstick for measuring worth, or more importantly self-worth. And while he goes on to argue why manual competence gives someone pride, connectedness and self-worth it is a point brought up by the review that I found even more compelling and he used a book by Alain de Botton, “The Pleasures and Sorrow of Work,” to illuminate a corollary and here I will quote directly from the review, as I can do no better at summarizing it.
“…when de Botton tours a biscuit factory in Belgium, he starts with mockery: ‘Grief was the only rational response to the news that an employee had spent 3 months devising a supermarket promotion based on an offer of free stickers of cartoon characters called the Fimbles.’ Then he thinks better of it and decided that, with a little imagination, it is possible to the the biscuit factory as an ennobling place:
The manufacture and promotion of all these (products) was no game, but rather an attempt to subsist which was no less grave, and threfore no less worthy of respect and dignity, than a boar hunt on whose successful conclusion the fate of an entire primitive community might have once have hung. For if a new wrapping machine did not operate as efficiently as anticipated, or if a slogan failed to capture the imagination of shoppers, there would be no escape from shutters houses and despair in the suburbs…
So to me the bigger question is how can everyone maintain this ‘pride’ that Crawford argues so compellingly about? From my own experience I know doing the right thing and the expedient thing are sometimes at the opposite sides of the spectrum, but certainly not mutually exclusive. I also know that one of my best summer jobs was building fences, and it had many of the elements that Crawford points out, manual competence, skill, the belief that what I was building would last and be appreciated by others. However, I can find that appreciation in other people and products, for example the fact that I never owned an ipod, and not so much that it looked slick but worked slick really impressed. Or that my car has a built in umbrella holder in the side of the door that drains outdoors I find slick, and slicker still that when I opened the door and looked in, there was an umbrella there. I appreciate the fact someone took the time to think about these things. With my own work, I always feel that it is our job to remove headaches and if we do it well it will be appreciated somewhere down the line. By the architect who can readily go to work on design, or by the construction manager who realizes that the as-builts or BIM is spot on and can then work faster or more efficiently. I can’t say how people may find it in their own work, but I can say it is there somewhere, and it is appreciated.
One of things in response to my profession, building surveying, that we have done is form the APBS (Association of Professional Building Surveyors) so we can create a certification for professionals who can take pride in their own work, and by forming our ‘guild’ let others know that when they receive our work that they can have faith in it. Now this sounds pretty mundane compared to a guy who has his own motorcycle repairshop, as that is Crawford’s profession, and I must say does not sound as cool but to me it’s the same concept. One note that is completely similar is that Crawford argues craftsmanship cannot be outsourced, that is when you need your car fixed, a new bathroom put in or bookshelves made, someone has to come to your house. Well, surveying the built environment, same argument.
AEC Edge Premiers: Industry Mag from AUGI – Focus on Revit
AEC Edge just premiered from AUGI. (Autodesk Users Group Intl.) It’s inital focus is to provideAutodesk users crucial information to “be more productive and on top of their game.” First issue seems to deal with all things Revit. 3D and IPD, and Revit in High School, which seems interesting that these deign/collobration tools are starting to far down the education pipeline. The format is of electronic magazine, where you flip pages which seems fine from a user consumption model, but web share model, and maybe it’s me, but does not seem as user friendly as it could be. For example, if I wanted to post a link to the article I just read, it is not readily apparent on how to do so, which seems counter intuitive in web dissmenation of content. Either way worth the read for those in the INdustry. And for AUGI, this is a crucial site and source for anyone, anybeing in the Autodesk Universe. They have provided, at least to me, more answers and information than any other site out there.
OGC 3D Fusion Summit @ MIT
Posted by Jim Foster in 3D, Built Environment, New Technologies, Point to Point Laser Technology on June 22, 2009
This event is being put on by the Open Geospatial Consortium, tough to type, tougher to say but it is one of many pushing for open standards and interoperability. They will be speaking about these issues and new tchnologies. I hope to stop by for some afternoon sessions and our lead technologist will be going so I hope to post on the presentations and findings.
USC BIM ROI Survey
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, ROI on June 21, 2009
I just read that USC put up a BIM survey focussed on ROI. The survey closed in April but I hope those results will be made public shortly.
GSA leading the pack with BIM and Revit for the Built Environment
Posted by Jim Foster in BIM, Built Environment, GSA, IFC on June 21, 2009
I put on a presentation in NYC for the GSA about capturing the built environment in BIM. Accurate as-builts and models are becoming more and more part of their workflow and the interest generated from their solicitations is fantastic. A couple of things became very apparent and our endemic to the industry as a whole.
- An accurate BIM is becoming the common language of the industry.
- There are a wide range of stakeholders involved and that some get it and some are new to the band wagon and wonder how this effects their everyday.
- They are looking for new tools and ways to get this information.
- Since they are platform agnostic the need for a true transportable format, a la IFC. (Industry Foundation Classes).
My feeling was that we are at the early adopter phase and we have evangelists and then everyone else so the more we are able to educate everyone and the more cases and success stories we can include, the better. If you’re reading this I encourage you to post, link back, etc. so I can use them in my presentations and disseminate the information.
What this says for the industry is akin to McDonalds requsting free range chicken which intially might be met from their suppliers with ; “That will be to expensive.” “We are not set up to do that.” etc. but eventually will turn into “I guess we better start providing free range chicken.” The GSA has taken the lead here now it’s our turn to say, “I guess we better start.” I think this will be a great opportunity.

