Archive for category BIM

Revit: As a Service? BIM As a Service? | SaaS

I read this morning through a linkedin update of an individual/firm that  is running Revit on a 16-core Intel i7 Xeon 2.67GHz, 1GB Video Card, 12GB RAM workstation, and was asking if anyone was interested in using it for design/rendering/etc.  I guess this was only a matter of time, but it begs the question of SaaS entering the AEC Software Marketplace.  AutoDesk has Dragonfly that allows to export directly into a Revit format.  I am not sure who the target user is for this, although they mention that “it can streamline your next home improvement. ”  Again is the regular home user or enthusiast going to pick up dragonfly for an improvement project?  Or is some who has a visualization program going to change workflows or programs to use Dragonfly?  Or better is it Autodesk trying to work the kinks out of what could become a full blown SaaS (Software as a Service) effort?  Certainly, they have to be thinking of this, especially when everyone can spit out SaaS or Cloud Computing fast enough to show they are with it.

What would the pricing model look like, free, freemium, premium, etc?  I think it would be important from a data point of view, not a legal who owns the data point of view, but imagine actually  having data stored centrally, and  and then the building becomes the OS (operating system) and everyone adds value to the building through analysis and management, and 3rd parties writing apps, etc. Not that does not happen now, but it in the standard software, mostly stand alone, environment.  Cracking this nut open as a marketplace, interesting to ponder.  ANd it could bring a whoel new vitality to the marketplace beyond the current BIM movement. Keep an eye out on Dragonfly it might just tell us.

Share

, ,

No Comments

IFC Open Engine: BIM

Following up from last post with the open question, Open Engine and IFC.  I found this but need to dig to see what is in development, who’s using it, succesful implmentations.  I know this blog is one in kajillion but would love to hear what the programming community is doing around this.

Share

, , ,

No Comments

BIM Required on Alteration and Adaptation over $2.5M: Wisconsin

So the GSA took the lead and states are starting to follow. Wisconsin announced that on all addition and alteration projects that require $2.5M or greater that a BIM is required. With this announcement they also released there own set of guidelines. Interesting note is that both the GSA and Wisconsin are platform agnostic and refer to software as BIM authoring software or discipline specialty software, and that it must be IFC compliant.

So when does the movement around IFC begin like Linux?

Share

, , , ,

No Comments

In Defense of Craftsmanship

“Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work” by Matthew B. Crawford was recently released by Penguin.  An excellent review from Kelefa Sanneh in the New Yorker was just in a recent addition of the New Yorker, and who’s review prompted this post.  While I have only read excerpts from the book the ideas certainly resonated with me.  The book is expanded from an article in The New Atlantis both the article and the book explore the idea of craftsmanship and how modernday office workers are so far removed from actual products they lose pride in there work.  He also argues that physical labor or “manual competence” is a key ingredient in craftsmanship, and who’s appreciation for how hard it can be to do something right forms a bridge or creates social currency between other craftsmen, generations and in general, people and the lack of it divorces us from our work, and then arguably, people.  Here he quotes Alexandre Kojève.

The man who works recognizes his own product in the World that has actually been transformed by his work: he recognizes himself in it, he sees in it his own human reality, in it he discovers and reveals to others the objective reality of his humanity, of the originally abstract and purely subjective idea he has of himself.

With the lack of manual competence and its social currency, the only thing we then have to rely on is hard currency, which may or may not be the best yardstick for measuring worth, or more importantly self-worth.  And while he goes on to argue why manual competence gives someone pride, connectedness and self-worth it is a point brought up by the review that I found even more compelling and he used a book by Alain de Botton, “The Pleasures and Sorrow of Work,” to illuminate a corollary and here I will quote directly from the review, as I can do no better at summarizing it.

“…when de Botton tours a biscuit factory in Belgium, he starts with mockery: ‘Grief was the only rational response to the news that an employee had spent 3 months devising a supermarket promotion based on an offer of free stickers of cartoon characters called the Fimbles.’ Then he thinks better of it and decided that, with a little imagination, it is possible to the the biscuit factory as an ennobling place:

The manufacture and promotion of all these (products) was no game, but rather an attempt to subsist which was no less grave, and threfore no less worthy of respect and dignity, than a boar hunt on whose successful conclusion the fate of an entire primitive community might have once have hung.  For if a new wrapping machine did not operate as efficiently as anticipated, or if a slogan failed to capture the imagination of shoppers, there would be no escape from shutters houses and despair in the suburbs…

So to me the bigger question is how can everyone maintain this ‘pride’ that Crawford argues so compellingly about?  From my own experience I know doing the right thing and the expedient thing are sometimes at the opposite sides of the spectrum, but certainly not mutually exclusive.  I also know that one of my best summer jobs was building fences, and it had many of the elements that Crawford points out, manual competence, skill, the belief that what I was building would last and be appreciated by others.  However, I can find that appreciation in other people and products, for example the fact that I never owned an ipod, and not so much that it looked slick but worked slick really impressed.  Or that my car has a built in umbrella holder in the side of the door that drains outdoors I find slick, and slicker still that when I opened the door and looked in, there was an umbrella there.  I appreciate the fact someone took the time to think about these things.  With my own work,  I always feel that it is our job to remove headaches and if we do it well it will be appreciated somewhere down the line.  By the architect who can readily go to work on design, or by the construction manager who realizes that the as-builts or BIM is spot on and can then work faster or more efficiently.  I can’t say how people may find it in their own work, but I can say it is there somewhere, and it is appreciated.

One of things in response to my profession, building surveying, that we have done is form the APBS (Association of Professional Building Surveyors) so we can create a certification for professionals who can take pride in their own work, and by forming our ‘guild’ let others know that when they receive our work that they can have faith in it.  Now this sounds pretty mundane compared to a guy who has his own motorcycle repairshop, as that is Crawford’s profession, and I must say does not sound as cool but to me it’s the same concept.  One note that is completely similar is that Crawford argues craftsmanship cannot be outsourced, that is when you need your car fixed, a new bathroom put in or bookshelves made, someone has to come to your house.  Well, surveying the built environment, same argument.

Share

No Comments

AEC Edge Premiers: Industry Mag from AUGI – Focus on Revit

AEC Edge just premiered from AUGI. (Autodesk Users Group Intl.)  It’s inital focus is to provideAutodesk users crucial information to “be more productive and on top of their game.”  First issue seems to deal with all things Revit.  3D and IPD, and Revit in High School, which seems interesting that these deign/collobration tools are starting to far down the education pipeline.  The format is of electronic magazine, where you flip pages which seems fine from a user consumption model, but web share model, and maybe it’s me, but does not seem as user friendly as it could be.  For example, if I wanted to post a link to the article I just read, it is not readily apparent on how to do so, which seems counter intuitive in web dissmenation of content.  Either way worth the read for those in the INdustry.  And for AUGI, this is a crucial site and source for anyone, anybeing in the Autodesk Universe.  They have provided, at least to me, more answers and information than any other site out there.

Share

, , ,

No Comments

USC BIM ROI Survey

I just read that USC put up a BIM survey focussed on ROI.  The survey closed in April but I hope those results will be made public shortly.

Share

No Comments

GSA leading the pack with BIM and Revit for the Built Environment

I put on a presentation in NYC for the GSA about capturing the built environment in BIM.  Accurate as-builts and models are becoming more and more part of their workflow and the interest generated from their solicitations is fantastic.  A couple of things became very apparent and our endemic to the industry as a whole.

  1. An accurate BIM is becoming the common language of the industry.
  2. There are a wide range of stakeholders involved and that some get it and some are new to the band wagon and wonder how this effects their everyday.
  3. They are looking for new tools and ways to get this information.
  4. Since they are platform agnostic the need for a true transportable format, a la IFC. (Industry Foundation Classes).

My feeling was that we are at the early adopter phase and we have evangelists and then everyone else so the more we are able to educate everyone and the more cases and success stories we can include, the better.  If you’re reading this I encourage you to post, link back, etc. so I can use them in my presentations and disseminate the information.

What this says for the industry is akin to McDonalds requsting free range chicken which intially might be met from their suppliers with ; “That will be to expensive.”  “We are not set up to do that.” etc. but eventually will turn into “I guess we better start providing free range chicken.”  The GSA has taken the lead here now it’s our turn to say, “I guess we better start.”  I think this will be a great opportunity.

Share

No Comments

Autodesk Posts 2009: Revit Continues to Outpace

Autodesk released its fiscal 2009 annual report and I thought it would be worthwhile to take a look at the numbers.  First, and most importantly to me  is the growth within in their AEC segment.  This segment in general posted a revenue gain of 9%, whereas the Revit family or products produced a revenue gain of 22% compared to itself in 2008.  I could boldly state that this is proof positive of Revit’s market acceptance, however, this is also an easy to mask would could be lousy performance.  For example, if I sold one box of cookies last year, and this y I sold two, voila 100% gain.  By seeing the actual numbers you are more likely to come to the conclusion that I am lousy cookie salesman, and this does not necessarily reflect on the product at all.

When looking at revenue by Geography, Revit posted a 40% Revenue gain compared to 2007, and compared to the AEC segment of 26% as a whole.  Again comparing it to itself does not shed a ton of light on the subject accept for the fact that Revit is accelerating.

If we look at this on a macro level, anyway you look at it, this is positive.  Autodesk could be discounting products in order to maintain top line growth.  Do I care?  No, since I do not own Autodesk as a stock holder, but am very invested in it as a user/developer.  So while a shareholder might be more interested in margins, I’m more about top line growth and adoption, so the fact that Revit is posting better revenue gains compared to the rest of the segment, I’m happy.

Strategically, I like the fact that Autodesk has almost $1 billion cash on hand in cash and cash equivalents, and that they have no problem making acquisitions of companies in their target zone.  What’s their target zone?  The way I look at it, imagine a building from conception to destruction and everything in between.  If you carve out a space in there you are in their target zone.  Interestingly they dropped FM Desktop which leaves a gap in their portfolio.  The fact they picked up Navisworks, Constructware, Ecotect, etc. shows they are serious in owning this space and that they do not want you to have to leave their product of families to do your work.  Hello Microsoft. How this plays with their commitment to IPD and cross platform compatibility will be interesting.   IPD is too big a deal to pay lip service too so I imagine they play along, continuing to create value within the BIM and IPD space, and acquiring companies who provide value added tools.

And if you are a Revit user, or thinking about switching over, signs look good that Autodesk has your back.  FYI Gartner Research reported in 2007 a 12% growth rate for BIM and Revit is beating those estimates.  If I get a bit more motivated I will try and break out Revit revenue from the AEC segement, breakout the % revnue from subscription and divide by average single seat license or average seat license and see if we can get to an installed base #, last time I tried something, and this was very unsicentific I had it around 300,000+.  I’ll follow this post up if I get some more cofee in me and can get excited to go through the annual report, 10K’s etc. in more detail.

Share

, , ,

No Comments

Atomic BIM

This is an excellent article, Atomic BIM by John Tobin.  The question that needs to get answered is how do we deal wtih BIM instead of BIM dealing on us.  For example,  we need seemless translation between authoring programs.  That is Navisworks collision detection data needs to move seemlessly for back into the model and then disseminate that information wirelessly to handhelds for those who need to know, etc.  Unfortunately, we are a long way off from there so what do we need to do to get there, and let’s make make sure not to fall into the same traps and lousy work arounds.  Anyway read the article.

Share

No Comments

GM Embraces BIM

So I am reading this article on ‘GM Embraces BIM‘, and wondering if I should post it, becuase, well, GM has had better days, but the points they made such as “…GM estimates that they are able to construct a building 25% faster, saving 10-15% of construction cost. And they can do this much safer than in the past, setting industry records on safety.”  Is worth mentioning.

I have been reading a variety of articles recently that mention laser scanning, including this one, matter of factly, on how to capture the built environment in BIM, when in fact it can be a time intensive and laborious practice.  While we are looking forward to the day when anyone can walk into a room and wave a wand and have a BIM pop out you need to look at the technologies available today, they type of project and what your deliverable needs to be to make the most informed decisions.  Many times using PPLT (Point to Point Laser Technology) can be the most cost effective option.

Share

, , ,

No Comments